REVENUE CONTEXT MACHINE

CONTEXT FOR
ACCOUNTS NOBODY REMEMBERS

Your CRM remembers what someone typed. VeryGood remembers what happened. We read every call, email, and message your team is already sending, ground each account in real evidence, and keep that record alive across every team that touches it — sales, implementation, success.

No new tools to adopt. Nothing for your Salesforce admin to configure.

See it in action → $ how it works
// paste in your terminal
# installs the VeryGood skill for Claude Code. $ curl -s "https://verygood.ai/install.sh" | sh
Miro// negotiation · $240k ARR
▸ next action ▌
✉
01

How it works

Three steps to turn everything your team already says and writes into a living record of every account — visible to sales, implementation, and success.

Connect 01

One-click into the tools your team already uses — calls, emails, chat, calendars, notes, and CRM. Read-only. No writeback, ever.

Gmail · Outlook · Slack · Gong · Fathom · HubSpot · Salesforce · Attio · Notion

Define 02

Drop in your playbook or write your stages as a checklist. Your methodology, as code a non-technical person can actually edit. No RevOps ticket. No Salesforce admin queue.

PDF · Notion · Google Docs · or write it in

Run 03

Every account gets a live record, the evidence behind each step, and written analysis grounded in your process. Re-runs as new conversations arrive.

continuous · evidence-backed · auditable

Run /verygood connect once. Every account inherits the memory from that day forward.

// status
stealth launch · design partners onboarding · case studies coming Q3 2026
// 01 the gap

Your CRM tells you what was typed. Not what happened.

Every serious account generates thousands of signals — discovery calls, implementation decisions, QBR commitments, Slack side-channels, the promise your AE made at dinner. Almost none of it reaches the record.

"Salesforce is really bad at this. I can't go into Salesforce and pick up every note the AE wrote and understand what really happened."
— VP Customer Success, enterprise CX platform

Three years later a new CSM inherits the account and starts from zero. A forecast reviews a stage, not a story. A renewal reopens questions you already answered. We don't fix this by replacing the CRM. We sit above it and read everything else.

hover to render
crm_vs_verygood — GlobalNet
SALESFORCE SAYS VERYGOOD READS ───────────────────── ──────────────────────────────────────── stage: renewal ✓ churn risk raised by VP Ops on 02/14 value: $1.2M ARR ✓ expansion to EU discussed 03/09 close: 06/30 ◐ 2 unresolved commits from QBR 02/21 owner: M. Chen ✗ no activity with EB in 47d next: — ⚑ 3 commitments due this quarter # same account. two records. one of them is the truth.
// 02 account memory

Three years of context. One searchable record.

When a new person inherits an account, they should not be inheriting a mystery.

VeryGood keeps a continuous, evidence-backed record of every significant moment across an account's lifetime. What problems were described in year one. What implementation was built, and why. What the sponsor said at the last QBR. What was promised that hasn't happened yet.

Every claim is traceable back to a real email, transcript, or message. Nothing fabricated. Nothing paraphrased into oblivion.

hover to render
verygood — recall · GlobalNet
$ vg recall --account "GlobalNet" --lens history ▣ ACCOUNT TIMELINE opened 2023 · 3 contracts · $1.2M ARR 2023 · discovery ✓ original pain: retention break on AI tier └─ call 08/14 "we can't keep losing 40% of new cohorts" 2023 · implementation ✓ delivered: workflow A · skipped: workflow B └─ call 11/03 impl team chose A per CFO request 2024 · QBR 1 ✓ expansion committed (EU), not yet scoped └─ email 04/22 · M. Chen "EU ready before renewal" 2024 · renewal ✓ 2yr extension signed └─ redlined MSA 06/18 2025 · QBR 3 ◐ sponsor changed · new VP Ops flagged concerns └─ call 09/15 "re-evaluating AI vendors across the stack" ⚑ outstanding from year 1: workflow B never scoped ⚑ outstanding from QBR 3: competitive evaluation unresolved
// 03 chain of custody

One record. Every team that touches the account.

The gap between sales, implementation, and success is the most expensive gap in B2B. The AE closes on a promise. The implementation team builds something adjacent. The CSM inherits both, sees neither.

VeryGood makes each handover a verified artifact, not a hopeful backfill. Sales closed it because of X. Implementation built Y in response. Success picks it up knowing what was committed, what was delivered, and what's still owed.

hover to render
handover.md — GlobalNet
▣ SALES → IMPLEMENTATION → SUCCESS ─── SALES ─────────────────────────────────────── ✓ pain quantified · call 08/14 ✓ timeline confirmed · email 09/02 ✓ champion identified · M. Chen (VP Retention) ✓ 3yr MSA signed · 10/30 ─── IMPLEMENTATION ────────────────────────────── ✓ workflow A shipped · delivered 12/14 ◐ workflow B scoped · deferred per CFO ✗ EU region · pushed to 2024 ─── SUCCESS ───────────────────────────────────── ✓ QBR 1: ROI confirmed · 04/22 ◐ sponsor turnover · new VP Ops 09/15 ⚑ renewal: year 3 · 06/30 # no backfilled handover doc written the morning of the meeting.
// 04 process

Your process, made visible. Then made better.

Most process tools enforce what you already have. VeryGood does that — but it also shows you which parts of your process are quietly broken.

Which step is skipped in 60% of closed-won deals. Which stage stalls most often. Which requirement nobody is actually meeting. The difference between the playbook on paper and the one your team is running in practice.

You don't need a perfect process to start. You need a process you can iterate on with evidence.

hover to render
verygood — diagnose · last 90d
$ vg diagnose --pipeline --last 90d ▣ PROCESS HEALTH 38 active · 12 closed this quarter stage coverage median d notes ──────────────────────────────────────────────────── discovery 94% 8 healthy validation 61% 19 ⚑ "quantify impact" skipped proposal 72% 12 ⚑ "legal review" adds 6d negotiation 88% 14 healthy patterns ───────────────────────────────────────────── ◐ closed-won where "quantify impact" was skipped: 7 of 12 → requirement may not be load-bearing. demote? ◐ "legal review": 6d avg delay, 4 deals stalled >14d → run parallel with proposal? # your playbook on paper vs. the one your team is running.
// 05 who this is for

One context engine. Every team that owns a customer.

The AE closes. The implementation team builds. The CSM keeps them. All three deserve the same record.

// sales leaders
A forecast grounded in what was said, not what was typed. Stalled deals surfaced before the QBR. Reps get credit for the work they're already doing. New hires ramp on real examples instead of folklore.
// cs / success leaders
Inherit an account with its full history, not a three-paragraph handover doc. Walk into every QBR knowing every prior commitment. Catch renewal risk six weeks earlier. Expansion conversations grounded in what the customer has already said they need.
// implementation / ops
See exactly what sales promised and what your team actually built. Catch the gap before it shows up in a churn conversation a year from now.
// 06 what this is

What's real.

  • ▸ Accuracy on well-written requirements runs 80–90%.
  • ▸ About 10% lands in an intermediate state you can resolve in one click.
  • ▸ You can always override. The record is yours; we're the reading layer.
  • ▸ Every ✓ is a quote from a real interaction. Nothing is a confidence score.
  • ▸ Read-only integrations. We write nothing back to your systems.
// 06 what this isn't

What's not.

  • ▸ Not a CRM. We sit above it.
  • ▸ Not a recorder or transcription tool. We read your existing ones.
  • ▸ Not a sequencer. We don't send emails for you.
  • ▸ Not BI. No warehouse, no SQL, no dashboard team required.
// 07 why now

Why this wasn't possible two years ago.

Context extraction at this depth — reading messy, multi-source, multi-turn conversations and producing reliable structured intelligence — was not solvable with rule-based systems or earlier NLP. It became solvable in 2024. We built VeryGood around that capability from day one.

And the timing on the other side matters too: B2B companies at the 200–1000 person stage are rebuilding their process in real time, because the playbooks that worked at 30 people don't survive at 300. If you're in a re-evaluation phase, this is a tool for the motion you're building, not the one you already ran.

58%
// quota attainment
Only 58% of AEs hit quota. The rest miss because execution is inconsistent.
23%
// SQL → closed-won
Conversion dropped from 29% to 23%. Deals stall when reps improvise.
+4wk
// cycle stretch
Without clarity, every deal takes more time and costs more.

source: ICONIQ State of GTM 2025

// 08 how we work

A small team, working with yours.

Not a self-serve login. An annual subscription with an embedded consulting retainer — we sit alongside your team and shape the process with you. An agency for your customer record, not software you're left to figure out.

We're working with a small number of design partners: you shape the product, you get attention we can't promise forever.

David, not Goliath. That's the offer.

Want to see it on one of your own accounts?

Pick a closed-won deal or an inherited account. Anonymize it if you need to. We'll run it through VeryGood and walk you through what comes out.

Book intro call → $ read the blog